Also added parameters ALFAllowPredefinedFilters and CCALFStrength and note on that that refinement of quantized filter coefficients not is used.

Also added parameters ALFAllowPredefinedFilters and CCALFStrength and note on that that refinement of quantized filter coefficients not is used.

This results in setting max_tid_ref_present_flag to 0 and not sending the syntax element.

The previous default of -1 would try to send (uint32_t)-1 in three bits.

Even without xWriteAPS, the functionality removing non-ref APS is already supported.

all of the suggestion that is from S/W coordinator are adopted.

1. modify doc/software-manual.tex

2. replace 2D array [64][64] for this MR with vector

3. fix Bug in bitstreamExtractorApp regarding removing APS.

- Add brace after conditions or loop in order to enclose single line.

implement JVET-S0219,
in order to implement extraction process that is decided to adopt by JVET_S0219, the equation (32) in the SPEC(JVET-S2001_vG) is needed to integrate. for this, JVET-R0193 and JVET-S0141 item47 is also implemented here.
please refer below meeting note for each aspect.
[JVET-S0219] Enable removal of parameter sets (i.e., PPS and APS) in non-output layer that is not used as reference for decoding of pictures in output layers during extraction process

AHG Recommendation (cleanup): Adopt APS aspect only.

[JVET-R0193] Signal max_tid_il_ref_pics_plus1 value separately for each direct reference layer of a layer, i.e. max_tid_il_ref_pics_plus1[ i ][ j ] for each direct reference layer j less than i, instead of single  max_tid_il_ref_pics_plus1[ i ]

AHG Recommendation (cleanup): Adopt. Text was provided in the contribution, and the authors are to supply the software

[JVET-S0141 item 47] In the general sub-bitstream extraction process, specify the conditions under which an output sub-bitstream is required to be a conforming bitstream such that the value of tIdTarget is specified to be in the range of 0 to vps_ptl_max_tid[ vps_ols_ptl_idx[ targetOlsIdx ] ], inclusive (instead of 0 to 6 inclusive)? (JVET-S0158 aspect 1)

Editor action item: The editor is suggested to include this change.